Skip to content
PlayLogic provides the latest gaming news, in-depth reviews…

Sheffield Wednesday Deals with a 'Significant Problem', Says Independent Regulator

'Our role is integral to football's future' - newly appointed regulator the regulator's chair

The team's ongoing struggles are seen as a "major concern" and the independent regulator is seeking powers to investigate clubs in such situations, its new chair the official has announced.

During an extensive discussion, Kogan, who was appointed on Monday, showed understanding towards supporters of the Owls.

The chairman convened with four supporters' associations representing the football team recently.

The Championship side have been experiencing difficulties in multiple areas in 2025, with the club missing wage payments on several different times, including in last month.

"Evidently Wednesday represents a serious issue for football authorities and a major challenge for the sport," the chairman stated.

"The club represents one of the great brands for English football and this week we have met Sheffield Wednesday supporters' groups.

"We are seeking authority... which will enable us to take Sheffield Wednesday - and other clubs submitted for our review if they need to be investigated and dealt with."

Economic Challenges and Ownership Situation

The team's struggling chairman the current owner suggested earlier this year he would be willing to sell up at the stadium, but he has failed to complete a sale with prospective buyers.

Missed wage deadlines on time in March and May led to sanctions by the football authorities in June, preventing the club from carrying out any player acquisitions for the next three transfer windows, although that restriction was lifted in August.

Regulator's Perspective

The chairman stated: "The position was created for the Owls followers, other clubs in similar situations where people are committed to a local institution that has been part of their lives in multiple situations.

"I have absolute sympathy for the team's plight, as I do for every team that since 1992 have gone to the wall, or been close to going to the wall, for reasons that have nothing to do with the supporters."

Questioned about whether the authority might compel an proprietor to divest a club if they are considered unfit, the chairman responded: "If your question is 'would we intervene in the final instance?', the response would be once we collect the information and know what's going on, we will."

But Kogan stressed that forcing owners to sell clubs would be considered the final option and the authority would rather to collaborate with owners.

"The final option we would consider is begin intervening in an specific team, an individual owner, without being able to work with that chairman to fix the problems affecting the organization and the owner's facing," the regulator explained.

"In actuality, when you examine the past of football, over the recent generations there have been some owners, a small minority, but certain individuals who have acted carelessly in the manner they have operated their teams and eventually don't wish to take responsibility for the long-term prospects."

Wednesday followers have been voicing opposition to owner Dejphon Chansiri in recent months

'Errors may undo substantial development'

Kogan met with representatives from 110 clubs to lay out the remit of the regulator on Wednesday and insisted it was a "progressive gathering" with a "substantial involvement" from the grassroots to elite level.

"It's a job that's actually really important, because if we get it wrong, if the world of football gets it wrong, the remarkable development accomplished could disappear incredibly quickly," the regulator warned.

"This represents everyone's worst fear in the context of the English game is a substantial accomplishment - we need to continue the progress.

"Substantial financial resources coming into football and has come into football for the last 20 or 25 years, because there's no guarantee it will persist in entering the game, which is among the factors explaining I think we have to adopt a precise perspective on potential dangers and naturally, of the next two or three years."

Premier League Concerns

Elite division representatives objected to the formation of an authority because of fears of a negative impact on the Premier League's sporting equality, but the chairman responded: "I'm absolutely committed to the prosperity and expansion as an financial organization of the Premier League.

"I of all people understand the worry about compromising the division as a high-quality offering of England. But concurrently, if you engage with division representatives after today's meeting, they would have had a significant degree of comfort -and, actually, they have been advising us privately they have a high level of reassurance."

Partisan Associations

The regulator remains subject to a "full inquiry" by the Commissioner for Public Appointments after he revealed he contributed money to the political party in 2020.

The official contributed funds to Culture Secretary the politician's campaign, along with that of the government leader.

"I have been entirely transparent regarding my previous political affiliation [with Labour], and that political affiliation came to an end the day the parliamentary committee confirmed my selection," the regulator explained.

"I currently have no participation in any sort of politics."

By

Christina Ellis

A passionate gamer and tech writer with over a decade of experience covering the gaming industry and creating engaging content for enthusiasts.

PlayLogic

Type to search articles.